Are they really that unlikely? I don't like these annotations unless it's clearly an error path or they have a high, demonstrable benefit.
IRQ_POLL_F_DISABLE is set when disabling the iop (in the end of the world). IRQ_POLL_F_SCHED is set on irq_poll_sched() itself so this cond would match only if the user called irq_poll_sched() twice which it shouldn't ever do. So yes, I think these are really unlikely() But now I noticed that I typo'ed the IRQ_POLL_F_SCHED from unlikely to likely :( need to fix that... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
