On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:28:07AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:36:14AM -0700, Scott Bauer wrote: > > > > I want some further clarification, if you don't mind. We call sec_ops > > inside the actual logic for the opal code. Which is only accessible via the > > ioctls, is that what you were meaning? When you say "the driver calls" > > do you mean that the nvme/sata/et al drivers would implement some generic > > block sed function that would be called via ioctl? > > So the call chain would be: > > > > Userland > > block/ioctl ops->blkdev_sed() > > > > nvme/et al (implements blkdev_sed()) which calls: > > > > sed.c blkdev_sed_ioctl(with passed in combined fn to get data to > > controller)? > > > > Is this what you were thinking, if so I agree it will alleviate a bunch of > > clutter > > in block/ioctl.c. If this isn't what you were thinking please let me know. > > Similar, but not quite the same. We already have an ioctl method in > struct block_device_operations, so in that we'd do something like > this for nvme:
Ah okay this was the piece I was missing. I was mixed up on how we would agnostically get it into the nvme drive and allow sata etc to do the same. Thanks for your help i'll get working. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
