Re: [PATCH v1 23/54] bcache: handle bio_clone() & bvec updating for multipage bvecs

[Coly Li]

On 2016/12/27 下午11:56, Ming Lei wrote:
> The incoming bio may be too big to be cloned into
> one singlepage bvecs bio, so split the bio and
> check the splitted bio one by one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leim...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/bcache/debug.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/debug.c b/drivers/md/bcache/debug.c
> index 48d03e8b3385..18b2d2d138e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/debug.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ void bch_btree_verify(struct btree *b)
>       up(&b->io_mutex);
>  }
>  
> -void bch_data_verify(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio *bio)
> +static void __bch_data_verify(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio *bio)
>  {
>       char name[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
>       struct bio *check;
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ void bch_data_verify(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio 
> *bio)
>        * in the new cloned bio because each single page need
>        * to assign to each bvec of the new bio.
>        */
> -     check = bio_clone(bio, GFP_NOIO);
> +     check = bio_clone_sp(bio, GFP_NOIO);
>       if (!check)
>               return;
>       check->bi_opf = REQ_OP_READ;
> @@ -151,6 +151,26 @@ void bch_data_verify(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio 
> *bio)
>       bio_put(check);
>  }
>  
> +void bch_data_verify(struct cached_dev *dc, struct bio *bio)
> +{
> +     struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev);
> +     struct bio *clone = bio_clone_fast(bio, GFP_NOIO, q->bio_split);
> +     unsigned sectors;
> +
> +     while (!bio_can_convert_to_sp(clone, &sectors)) {
> +             struct bio *split = bio_split(clone, sectors,
> +                                           GFP_NOIO, q->bio_split);
> +
> +             __bch_data_verify(dc, split);
> +             bio_put(split);
> +     }
> +
> +     if (bio_sectors(clone))
> +             __bch_data_verify(dc, clone);
> +
> +     bio_put(clone);
> +}
> +

Hi Lei,

The above patch is good IMHO. Just wondering why not use the classical
style ? something like,


do {
        if (!bio_can_convert_to_sp(clone, &sectors))
                split = bio_split(clone, sectors,
                                  GFP_NOIO, q->bio_split);
        else
                split = clone;

        __bch_data_verity(gc, split);
        bio_put(split);
} while (split != clone);


I guess maybe the above style generates less binary code.


-- 
Coly Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html