On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:40:53PM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> Resending it at as a plain text.
>
> From: Chaitanya Kulkarni
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 2:37 PM
> To: lsf...@lists.linux-foundation.org
> Cc: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org; linux-block@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-n...@lists.infradead.org; linux-s...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [LFS/MM TOPIC][LFS/MM ATTEND]: - Storage Stack and Driver Testing
> methodology.
>
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I would like to propose a general discussion on Storage stack and device
> driver testing.
>
> Purpose:-
> -------------
> The main objective of this discussion is to address the need for
> a Unified Test Automation Framework which can be used by different subsystems
> in the kernel in order to improve the overall development and stability
> of the storage stack.
>
> For Example:-
> From my previous experience, I've worked on the NVMe driver testing last year
> and we
> have developed simple unit test framework
> (https://github.com/linux-nvme/nvme-cli/tree/master/tests).
> In current implementation Upstream NVMe Driver supports following subsystems:-
> 1. PCI Host.
> 2. RDMA Target.
> 3. Fiber Channel Target (in progress).
> Today due to lack of centralized automated test framework NVMe Driver testing
> is
> scattered and performed using the combination of various utilities like
> nvme-cli/tests,
> nvmet-cli, shell scripts (git://git.infradead.org/nvme-fabrics.git
> nvmf-selftests) etc.
>
> In order to improve overall driver stability with various subsystems, it will
> be beneficial
> to have a Unified Test Automation Framework (UTAF) which will centralize
> overall
> testing.
>
> This topic will allow developers from various subsystem engage in the
> discussion about
> how to collaborate efficiently instead of having discussions on lengthy email
> threads.
>
> Participants:-
> ------------------
> I'd like to invite developers from different subsystems to discuss an
> approach towards
> a unified testing methodology for storage stack and device drivers belongs to
> different subsystems.
>
> Topics for Discussion:-
> ------------------------------
> As a part of discussion following are some of the key points which we can
> focus on:-
> 1. What are the common components of the kernel used by the various
> subsystems?
> 2. What are the potential target drivers which can benefit from this
> approach?
> (e.g. NVMe, NVMe Over Fabric, Open Channel Solid State Drives etc.)
> 3. What are the desired features that can be implemented in this Framework?
> (code coverage, unit tests, stress testings, regression, generating
> Coccinelle reports etc.)
> 4. Desirable Report generation mechanism?
> 5. Basic performance validation?
> 6. Whether QEMU can be used to emulate some of the H/W functionality to
> create a test
> platform? (Optional subsystem specific)
Well, something I was thinking about but didn't find enough time to actually
implement is making a xfstestes like test suite written using sg3_utils for
SCSI. This idea could very well be extented to NVMe, AHCI, blk, etc...
Byte,
Johannes
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumsh...@suse.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
