On 01/19/2017 02:54 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Jens Axboe,
> 
> This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
> 
> The patch 4941115bef2b: "blk-mq-tag: cleanup the normal/reserved tag 
> allocation" from Jan 13, 2017, leads to the following Smatch 
> complaint:
> 
> block/blk-mq-tag.c:142 blk_mq_get_tag()
>        warn: variable dereferenced before check 'data->hctx' (see line 102)
> 
> block/blk-mq-tag.c
>    101        {
>    102                struct blk_mq_tags *tags = blk_mq_tags_from_data(data);
>                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> We added a new "data->hctx" dereference here.
> 
>    103                struct sbitmap_queue *bt;
>    104                struct sbq_wait_state *ws;
>    105                DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>    106                unsigned int tag_offset;
>    107                int tag;
>    108        
>    109                if (data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED) {
>    110                        if (unlikely(!tags->nr_reserved_tags)) {
>    111                                WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>    112                                return BLK_MQ_TAG_FAIL;
>    113                        }
>    114                        bt = &tags->breserved_tags;
>    115                        tag_offset = 0;
>    116                } else {
>    117                        bt = &tags->bitmap_tags;
>    118                        tag_offset = tags->nr_reserved_tags;
>    119                }
>    120        
>    121                tag = __blk_mq_get_tag(data->hctx, bt);
>    122                if (tag != -1)
>    123                        goto found_tag;
>    124        
>    125                if (data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT)
>    126                        return BLK_MQ_TAG_FAIL;
>    127        
>    128                ws = bt_wait_ptr(bt, data->hctx);
>    129                do {
>    130                        prepare_to_wait(&ws->wait, &wait, 
> TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>    131        
>    132                        tag = __blk_mq_get_tag(data->hctx, bt);
>    133                        if (tag != -1)
>    134                                break;
>    135        
>    136                        /*
>    137                         * We're out of tags on this hardware queue, 
> kick any
>    138                         * pending IO submits before going to sleep 
> waiting for
>    139                         * some to complete. Note that hctx can be NULL 
> here for
>    140                         * reserved tag allocation.
>    141                         */
>    142                        if (data->hctx)
> 
> We're in a loop here so it's possible we don't need to check the first
> item in the list, but it's kind of new so I thought I would forward the
> message anyway even though it might be a false positive.

It's no longer possible for 'hctx' to be passed in as NULL, so the above
dereference is safe. I'll tend to this superfluous hctx check.


-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to