On 02/02/2017 11:34 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> Allocate struct backing_dev_info separately instead of embedding it
> inside the superblock. This unifies handling of bdi among users.
> 
> CC: Tyler Hicks <[email protected]>

Looks fine to me.

Acked-by: Tyler Hicks <[email protected]>

> CC: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/ecryptfs/ecryptfs_kernel.h | 1 -
>  fs/ecryptfs/main.c            | 4 +---
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/ecryptfs_kernel.h b/fs/ecryptfs/ecryptfs_kernel.h
> index 599a29237cfe..e93444a4c4b1 100644
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/ecryptfs_kernel.h
> +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/ecryptfs_kernel.h
> @@ -349,7 +349,6 @@ struct ecryptfs_mount_crypt_stat {
>  struct ecryptfs_sb_info {
>       struct super_block *wsi_sb;
>       struct ecryptfs_mount_crypt_stat mount_crypt_stat;
> -     struct backing_dev_info bdi;
>  };
>  
>  /* file private data. */
> diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/main.c b/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
> index 151872dcc1f4..9014479d0160 100644
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
> +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
> @@ -519,12 +519,11 @@ static struct dentry *ecryptfs_mount(struct 
> file_system_type *fs_type, int flags
>               goto out;
>       }
>  
> -     rc = bdi_setup_and_register(&sbi->bdi, "ecryptfs");
> +     rc = super_setup_bdi(s);
>       if (rc)
>               goto out1;
>  
>       ecryptfs_set_superblock_private(s, sbi);
> -     s->s_bdi = &sbi->bdi;
>  
>       /* ->kill_sb() will take care of sbi after that point */
>       sbi = NULL;
> @@ -633,7 +632,6 @@ static void ecryptfs_kill_block_super(struct super_block 
> *sb)
>       if (!sb_info)
>               return;
>       ecryptfs_destroy_mount_crypt_stat(&sb_info->mount_crypt_stat);
> -     bdi_destroy(&sb_info->bdi);
>       kmem_cache_free(ecryptfs_sb_info_cache, sb_info);
>  }
>  
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to