Hi,
On Tuesday, February 28, 2017 06:45:20 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Thursday, February 09, 2017 04:33:58 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
> > Instead of doing retries at the same time as trying to submit new
> > requests, do the retries when the request is reported as completed
> > by the driver, in the finalization worker.
> >
> > This is achieved by letting the core worker call back into the block
> > layer using mmc_blk_rw_done(), that will read the status and repeatedly
> > try to hammer the request using single request etc by calling back to
> > the core layer using mmc_restart_areq()
> >
> > The beauty of it is that the completion will not complete until the
> > block layer has had the opportunity to hammer a bit at the card using
> > a bunch of different approaches in the while() loop in
> > mmc_blk_rw_done()
> >
> > The algorithm for recapture, retry and handle errors is essentially
> > identical to the one we used to have in mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(),
> > only augmented to get called in another path.
> >
> > We have to add and initialize a pointer back to the struct mmc_queue
> > from the struct mmc_queue_req to find the queue from the asynchronous
> > request.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
>
> It seems that after this change we can end up queuing more
> work for kthread from the kthread worker itself and wait
> inside it for this nested work to complete. I hope that
On the second look it seems that there is no waiting for
the retried areq to complete so I cannot see what protects
us from racing and trying to run two areq-s in parallel:
1st areq being retried (in the completion kthread):
mmc_blk_rw_done()->mmc_restart_areq()->__mmc_start_data_req()
2nd areq coming from the second request in the queue
(in the queuing kthread):
mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq()->mmc_start_areq()->__mmc_start_data_req()
(after mmc_blk_rw_done() is done in mmc_finalize_areq() 1st
areq is marked as completed by the completion kthread and
the waiting on host->areq in mmc_start_areq() of the queuing
kthread is done and 2nd areq is started while the 1st one
is still being retried)
?
Also retrying of areqs for MMC_BLK_RETRY status case got broken
(before change do {} while() loop increased retry variable,
now the loop is gone and retry variable will not be increased
correctly and we can loop forever).
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
