Rename cgwb_bdi_destroy() to cgwb_bdi_unregister() as it gets called
from bdi_unregister() which is not necessarily called from bdi_destroy()
and thus the name is somewhat misleading.

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
---
 mm/backing-dev.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index 7592f4a36776..54c1ff39ea05 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ static int cgwb_bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
        return ret;
 }
 
-static void cgwb_bdi_destroy(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+static void cgwb_bdi_unregister(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 {
        struct radix_tree_iter iter;
        struct rb_node *rbn;
@@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ static int cgwb_bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
        return 0;
 }
 
-static void cgwb_bdi_destroy(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+static void cgwb_bdi_unregister(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 {
        wb_congested_put(bdi->wb_congested);
 }
@@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ void bdi_unregister(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
        /* make sure nobody finds us on the bdi_list anymore */
        bdi_remove_from_list(bdi);
        wb_shutdown(&bdi->wb);
-       cgwb_bdi_destroy(bdi);
+       cgwb_bdi_unregister(bdi);
 
        if (bdi->dev) {
                bdi_debug_unregister(bdi);
-- 
2.10.2

Reply via email to