>> >> Thanks for the review Sagi. I’d be OK going with <=0 as the exact >> match would normally be for minimal IO sizes (where <= and = are the >> same thing). I will see what other feedback I get and aim to do a >> respin soon… > > No tunables for this, please. There's absolutely no reason why we should > need it.
Jens – by this you mean you want to only bucket IO that are exactly the minimum block size supported by the underlying block device? I was envisioning we might want to relax that in certain cases (e.g. bucket 4KB and below going to a 512B device). Stephen
