On Wed, Apr 05 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 05-04-17 09:19:27, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Wed 05-04-17 14:33:50, NeilBrown wrote:
> [...]
>> > diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
>> > index 0ecb6461ed81..44b3506fd086 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
>> > @@ -852,6 +852,7 @@ static int loop_prepare_queue(struct loop_device *lo)
>> > if (IS_ERR(lo->worker_task))
>> > return -ENOMEM;
>> > set_user_nice(lo->worker_task, MIN_NICE);
>> > + lo->worker_task->flags |= PF_LESS_THROTTLE;
>> > return 0;
>>
>> As mentioned elsewhere, PF flags should be updated only on the current
>> task otherwise there is potential rmw race. Is this safe? The code runs
>> concurrently with the worker thread.
>
> I believe you need something like this instead
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index f347285c67ec..07b2a909e4fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -844,10 +844,16 @@ static void loop_unprepare_queue(struct loop_device *lo)
> kthread_stop(lo->worker_task);
> }
>
> +int loop_kthread_worker_fn(void *worker_ptr)
> +{
> + current->flags |= PF_LESS_THROTTLE;
> + return kthread_worker_fn(worker_ptr);
> +}
> +
> static int loop_prepare_queue(struct loop_device *lo)
> {
> kthread_init_worker(&lo->worker);
> - lo->worker_task = kthread_run(kthread_worker_fn,
> + lo->worker_task = kthread_run(loop_kthread_worker_fn,
> &lo->worker, "loop%d", lo->lo_number);
> if (IS_ERR(lo->worker_task))
> return -ENOMEM;
Arg - of course.
How about we just split the kthread_create from the wake_up?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
From: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] loop: Add PF_LESS_THROTTLE to block/loop device thread.
When a filesystem is mounted from a loop device, writes are
throttled by balance_dirty_pages() twice: once when writing
to the filesystem and once when the loop_handle_cmd() writes
to the backing file. This double-throttling can trigger
positive feedback loops that create significant delays. The
throttling at the lower level is seen by the upper level as
a slow device, so it throttles extra hard.
The PF_LESS_THROTTLE flag was created to handle exactly this
circumstance, though with an NFS filesystem mounted from a
local NFS server. It reduces the throttling on the lower
layer so that it can proceed largely unthrottled.
To demonstrate this, create a filesystem on a loop device
and write (e.g. with dd) several large files which combine
to consume significantly more than the limit set by
/proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio or dirty_bytes. Measure the total
time taken.
When I do this directly on a device (no loop device) the
total time for several runs (mkfs, mount, write 200 files,
umount) is fairly stable: 28-35 seconds.
When I do this over a loop device the times are much worse
and less stable. 52-460 seconds. Half below 100seconds,
half above.
When I apply this patch, the times become stable again,
though not as fast as the no-loop-back case: 53-72 seconds.
There may be room for further improvement as the total overhead still
seems too high, but this is a big improvement.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com>
---
drivers/block/loop.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 0ecb6461ed81..95679d988725 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -847,10 +847,12 @@ static void loop_unprepare_queue(struct loop_device *lo)
static int loop_prepare_queue(struct loop_device *lo)
{
kthread_init_worker(&lo->worker);
- lo->worker_task = kthread_run(kthread_worker_fn,
+ lo->worker_task = kthread_create(kthread_worker_fn,
&lo->worker, "loop%d", lo->lo_number);
if (IS_ERR(lo->worker_task))
return -ENOMEM;
+ lo->worker_task->flags |= PF_LESS_THROTTLE;
+ wake_up_process(lo->worker_task);
set_user_nice(lo->worker_task, MIN_NICE);
return 0;
}
--
2.12.2
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
