On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 04:01:02PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 01:58:37PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > The blk-mq debugfs attributes are removed after blk_cleanup_queue()
> > has finished. Since running a queue after a queue has entered the
> > "dead" state is not allowed, disallow this. This patch avoids that
> > an attempt to run a dead queue triggers a kernel crash.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Omar Sandoval <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  block/blk-mq-debugfs.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> > index df9b688b877c..a1ce823578c7 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> > @@ -111,6 +111,14 @@ static ssize_t blk_queue_flags_store(struct file 
> > *file, const char __user *ubuf,
> >     struct request_queue *q = file_inode(file)->i_private;
> >     char op[16] = { }, *s;
> >  
> > +   /*
> > +    * The debugfs attributes are removed after blk_cleanup_queue() has
> > +    * called blk_mq_free_queue(). Return if QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD has been set
> > +    * to avoid triggering a use-after-free.
> > +    */
> > +   if (blk_queue_dead(q))
> > +           return -ENOENT;
> > +
> >     len = min(len, sizeof(op) - 1);
> >     if (copy_from_user(op, ubuf, len))
> >             return -EFAULT;
> > -- 
> > 2.12.0
> > 
> 
> Hi, Bart,
> 
> Looking at this, I think we have similar issues with most of the other
> debugfs files. Should we move the debugfs cleanup earlier?

In particular, I think we can call blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_hctxs()
(which is somewhat poorly named, as it removes the whole mq directory)
before we call blk_mq_free_queue(). I was under the impression that
that's what it already did, but I think I was wrong.

Reply via email to