On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 09:54:54AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> They serve the exact same purpose. Get rid of the non-delayed
> work variant, and just run it without delay for the normal case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c       |  2 +-
>  block/blk-mq.c         | 27 ++++++---------------------
>  include/linux/blk-mq.h |  3 +--
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 8654aa0cef6d..d58541e4dc7b 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ void blk_sync_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>               int i;
>  
>               queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
> -                     cancel_work_sync(&hctx->run_work);
> +                     cancel_delayed_work_sync(&hctx->run_work);
>                       cancel_delayed_work_sync(&hctx->delay_work);
>               }
>       } else {
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index e2ef7b460924..7afba6ab5a96 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1168,13 +1168,9 @@ static void __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct 
> blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async,
>               put_cpu();
>       }
>  
> -     if (msecs == 0)
> -             kblockd_schedule_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx),
> -                                      &hctx->run_work);
> -     else
> -             kblockd_schedule_delayed_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx),
> -                                              &hctx->delayed_run_work,
> -                                              msecs_to_jiffies(msecs));
> +     kblockd_schedule_delayed_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx),
> +                                      &hctx->run_work,
> +                                      msecs_to_jiffies(msecs));
>  }
>  
>  void blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned long 
> msecs)
> @@ -1226,7 +1222,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_queue_stopped);
>  
>  void blk_mq_stop_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>  {
> -     cancel_work(&hctx->run_work);
> +     cancel_delayed_work(&hctx->run_work);
>       cancel_delayed_work(&hctx->delay_work);
>       set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_STOPPED, &hctx->state);
>  }
> @@ -1284,17 +1280,7 @@ static void blk_mq_run_work_fn(struct work_struct 
> *work)
>  {
>       struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
>  
> -     hctx = container_of(work, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, run_work);
> -
> -     __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx);
> -}
> -
> -static void blk_mq_delayed_run_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> -{
> -     struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> -
> -     hctx = container_of(work, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, delayed_run_work.work);
> -
> +     hctx = container_of(work, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, run_work.work);
>       __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1899,8 +1885,7 @@ static int blk_mq_init_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
>       if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
>               node = hctx->numa_node = set->numa_node;
>  
> -     INIT_WORK(&hctx->run_work, blk_mq_run_work_fn);
> -     INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hctx->delayed_run_work, blk_mq_delayed_run_work_fn);
> +     INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hctx->run_work, blk_mq_run_work_fn);
>       INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hctx->delay_work, blk_mq_delay_work_fn);
>       spin_lock_init(&hctx->lock);
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hctx->dispatch);
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> index d75de612845d..2b4573a9ccf4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
>               unsigned long           state;          /* BLK_MQ_S_* flags */
>       } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>  
> -     struct work_struct      run_work;
> +     struct delayed_work     run_work;
>       cpumask_var_t           cpumask;
>       int                     next_cpu;
>       int                     next_cpu_batch;
> @@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
>  
>       atomic_t                nr_active;
>  
> -     struct delayed_work     delayed_run_work;
>       struct delayed_work     delay_work;
>  
>       struct hlist_node       cpuhp_dead;
> -- 
> 2.7.4

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Ming

Reply via email to