On Wed, 17 May 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Thanks Richard, > > this looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:28:53PM -0700, Richard Narron wrote: > > The code in block/partitions/msdos.c recognizes FreeBSD, OpenBSD > > and NetBSD partitions and does a reasonable job picking out OpenBSD > > and NetBSD UFS subpartitions. > > > > But for FreeBSD the subpartitions are always "bad". > > > > Kernel: <bsd:bad subpartition - ignored > > > > Though all 3 of these BSD systems use UFS as a file system, only > > FreeBSD uses relative start addresses in the subpartition > > declarations. > > > > The following patch fixes this for FreeBSD partitions and leaves > > the code for OpenBSD and NetBSD intact: > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Narron <[email protected]> > > --- > > block/partitions/msdos.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > --- a/block/partitions/msdos.c 2015-12-27 18:17:37.000000000 -0800 > > +++ b/block/partitions/msdos.c 2015-12-29 10:44:25.813773357 -0800 5~> > @@ -300,6 +300,8 @@ static void parse_bsd(struct parsed_part > > continue; > > bsd_start = le32_to_cpu(p->p_offset); > > bsd_size = le32_to_cpu(p->p_size); > > + if (memcmp(flavour, "bsd\0", 4) == 0) > > + bsd_start = bsd_start + offset; > > this could be +=, but I don't think it really matters. >
Thanks Christophe, I will create a version 2 with +=. Good style makes maintenance easier. -- Richard Narron
