On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 11:58:02AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 08:48:00PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > For WRITE SAME, scsi_report_opcode() is gated not only by > > sdev->no_report_opcodes but by sdev->no_write_same. > > > > I'm concerned about firing off REPORT OPCODES to random devices without > > a sufficiently good heuristic. Doesn't look like SAT has anything to > > offer in this department, though. Maybe it's time to consider a > > vendor-specific Linux VPD page... > > Eww. Given that as far as I can tell only ATA devices implement > OPAL we could key it off that for now. But that's only going to > defer the problem until support for other security protocols comes > along for real SCSI devices. > > But as we already set no_report_opcodes for all usb-storage and > quirked uas devices I think the worst offenders are already covered > anyway.
Martin, how do we want to move ahead on this patch?
