On 06/20/2017 12:07 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanass...@sandisk.com>
> 
> Initialization of blk-mq requests is a bit weird: blk_mq_rq_ctx_init()
> is called after a value has been assigned to .rq_flags and .rq_flags
> is initialized in __blk_mq_finish_request(). Initialize .rq_flags in
> blk_mq_rq_ctx_init() instead of relying on __blk_mq_finish_request().
> Moving the initialization of .rq_flags is fine because all changes
> and tests of .rq_flags occur between blk_get_request() and finishing
> a request.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanass...@sandisk.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.com>
> Cc: Omar Sandoval <osan...@fb.com>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming....@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 8cd423ba585d..679b52790bc1 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(struct 
> blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
>       rq->q = data->q;
>       rq->mq_ctx = data->ctx;
>       rq->cmd_flags = op;
> +     rq->rq_flags = 0;
>       if (blk_queue_io_stat(data->q))
>               rq->rq_flags |= RQF_IO_STAT;
>       /* do not touch atomic flags, it needs atomic ops against the timer */
> @@ -435,7 +436,6 @@ void blk_mq_free_request(struct request *rq)
>               atomic_dec(&hctx->nr_active);
>  
>       wbt_done(q->rq_wb, &rq->issue_stat);
> -     rq->rq_flags = 0;
>  
>       clear_bit(REQ_ATOM_STARTED, &rq->atomic_flags);
>       clear_bit(REQ_ATOM_POLL_SLEPT, &rq->atomic_flags);
> 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.com>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Teamlead Storage & Networking
h...@suse.de                                   +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Reply via email to