On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:19:54AM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
> 
> Just check and advance the errseq_t in the file before returning.
> Internal callers of filemap_* functions are left as-is.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/file.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> index da1096eb1a40..1f57e1a523d9 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> @@ -2011,7 +2011,7 @@ int btrfs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, 
> loff_t end, int datasync)
>       struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
>       struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
>       struct btrfs_log_ctx ctx;
> -     int ret = 0;
> +     int ret = 0, err;
>       bool full_sync = 0;
>       u64 len;
>  
> @@ -2030,7 +2030,7 @@ int btrfs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, 
> loff_t end, int datasync)
>        */
>       ret = start_ordered_ops(inode, start, end);
>       if (ret)
> -             return ret;
> +             goto out;
>  
>       inode_lock(inode);
>       atomic_inc(&root->log_batch);
> @@ -2227,6 +2227,9 @@ int btrfs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, 
> loff_t end, int datasync)
>               ret = btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
>       }
>  out:
> +     err = file_check_and_advance_wb_err(file);
> +     if (!ret)
> +             ret = err;
>       return ret > 0 ? -EIO : ret;

This means that we'll lose the exact error returned from
start_ordered_ops.  Beyond that I can't really provide good feedback
as the btrfs fsync code looks so much different from all the other
fs fsync code..

Reply via email to