On 2017/7/1 上午4:43, bca...@lists.ewheeler.net wrote:
> From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
> 
> continue_at() doesn't have a return statement anymore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>

Acked-by: Coly Li <col...@suse.de>

Thanks.

Coly

> ---
>  drivers/md/bcache/closure.h | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
> index 1ec84ca..295b7e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
> @@ -312,8 +312,6 @@ static inline void closure_wake_up(struct 
> closure_waitlist *list)
>   * been dropped with closure_put()), it will resume execution at @fn running 
> out
>   * of @wq (or, if @wq is NULL, @fn will be called by closure_put() directly).
>   *
> - * NOTE: This macro expands to a return in the calling function!
> - *
>   * This is because after calling continue_at() you no longer have a ref on 
> @cl,
>   * and whatever @cl owns may be freed out from under you - a running closure 
> fn
>   * has a ref on its own closure which continue_at() drops.
> @@ -340,8 +338,6 @@ do {                                                      
>                 \
>   * Causes @fn to be executed out of @cl, in @wq context (or called directly 
> if
>   * @wq is NULL).
>   *
> - * NOTE: like continue_at(), this macro expands to a return in the caller!
> - *
>   * The ref the caller of continue_at_nobarrier() had on @cl is now owned by 
> @fn,
>   * thus it's not safe to touch anything protected by @cl after a
>   * continue_at_nobarrier().
> 

Reply via email to