This patch fixes the following sparse warnings:

drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:916:45: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 
(different base types)
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:916:45:    expected restricted blk_status_t 
[usertype] error
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:916:45:    got int [signed] error
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1599:47: warning: incorrect type in assignment 
(different base types)
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1599:47:    expected int [signed] error
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1599:47:    got restricted blk_status_t [usertype] 
<noident>
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1607:55: warning: incorrect type in assignment 
(different base types)
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1607:55:    expected int [signed] error
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1607:55:    got restricted blk_status_t [usertype] 
<noident>
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1625:55: warning: incorrect type in assignment 
(different base types)
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1625:55:    expected int [signed] error
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1625:55:    got restricted blk_status_t [usertype] 
<noident>
drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1628:62: warning: restricted blk_status_t degrades 
to integer

Compile-tested only.

Fixes: commit 2a842acab109 ("block: introduce new block status code type")
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]>
Cc: Roger Pau MonnĂ© <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
index c852ed3c01d5..1799bba74390 100644
--- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
+++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ struct blk_shadow {
 };
 
 struct blkif_req {
-       int     error;
+       blk_status_t    error;
 };
 
 static inline struct blkif_req *blkif_req(struct request *rq)
@@ -1616,7 +1616,7 @@ static irqreturn_t blkif_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
                        if (unlikely(bret->status == BLKIF_RSP_EOPNOTSUPP)) {
                                printk(KERN_WARNING "blkfront: %s: %s op 
failed\n",
                                       info->gd->disk_name, 
op_name(bret->operation));
-                               blkif_req(req)->error = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+                               blkif_req(req)->error = BLK_STS_NOTSUPP;
                        }
                        if (unlikely(bret->status == BLKIF_RSP_ERROR &&
                                     rinfo->shadow[id].req.u.rw.nr_segments == 
0)) {
-- 
2.13.2

Reply via email to