On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 14:56 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> +static inline bool blk_mq_has_dispatch_rqs(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> +{
> +     return !list_empty_careful(&hctx->dispatch);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void blk_mq_add_rq_to_dispatch(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> +             struct request *rq)
> +{
> +     spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
> +     list_add(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);
> +     blk_mq_hctx_set_dispatch_busy(hctx);
> +     spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void blk_mq_add_list_to_dispatch(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> +             struct list_head *list)
> +{
> +     spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
> +     list_splice_init(list, &hctx->dispatch);
> +     blk_mq_hctx_set_dispatch_busy(hctx);
> +     spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void blk_mq_add_list_to_dispatch_tail(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx 
> *hctx,
> +                                                 struct list_head *list)
> +{
> +     spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
> +     list_splice_tail_init(list, &hctx->dispatch);
> +     blk_mq_hctx_set_dispatch_busy(hctx);
> +     spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void blk_mq_take_list_from_dispatch(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> +             struct list_head *list)
> +{
> +     spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
> +     list_splice_init(&hctx->dispatch, list);
> +     spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
> +}

Same comment for this patch: these helper functions are so short that I'm not
sure it is useful to introduce these helper functions.

Bart.

Reply via email to