On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:17:44AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>> +    u8 eui64[8] = { 0 }, nguid[16] = { 0 };
>> +    uuid_t uuid = uuid_null;
>>      int ret = 0;
>>      if (test_bit(NVME_NS_DEAD, &ns->flags)) {
>> @@ -1252,7 +1254,15 @@ static int nvme_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
>>              goto out;
>>      }
>>   -  nvme_report_ns_ids(ctrl, ns->ns_id, id, ns->eui, ns->nguid, 
>> &ns->uuid);
>> +    nvme_report_ns_ids(ctrl, ns->ns_id, id, eui64, nguid, &uuid);
>> +    if (!uuid_equal(&ns->uuid, &uuid) ||
>> +        memcmp(&ns->nguid, &nguid, sizeof(ns->nguid)) ||
>> +        memcmp(&ns->eui, &eui64, sizeof(ns->eui))) {
>
> Shouldn't uuid,nguid,eui64 record the previous values prior to calling
> nvme_report_ns_ids?

The previous values are still in the namespace structure, and we use
the on-stack variables for the current ones.

Reply via email to