if blk-mq use "none" io scheduler, nr_request get a wrong value when
input a number > tag_set->queue_depth. blk_mq_tag_update_depth will get
the smaller one min(nr, set->queue_depth), and then q->nr_request get a
wrong value.

Reproduce:

echo none > /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/scheduler
echo 1000000 > /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/nr_requests
cat /sys/block/nvme0n1/queue/nr_requests
1000000

Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <[email protected]>
---

Changes since v4:
 * fix typo in commit message(queue/ioscheduler => queue/scheduler)

Changes since v3:
 * remove compare nr with tags->qdepth, pass nr to blk_mq_tag_update_depth
directly

 * remove return EINVAL when user modify nr_request less than BLKDEV_MIN_RQ

Changes since v2:
 * add return EINVAL when user modify nr_request less than BLKDEV_MIN_RQ
 * remove pr_warn, and return EINVAL, if input number is too large

 block/blk-mq.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 98a1860..491e336 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2642,8 +2642,7 @@ int blk_mq_update_nr_requests(struct request_queue *q, 
unsigned int nr)
                 * queue depth. This is similar to what the old code would do.
                 */
                if (!hctx->sched_tags) {
-                       ret = blk_mq_tag_update_depth(hctx, &hctx->tags,
-                                                       min(nr, 
set->queue_depth),
+                       ret = blk_mq_tag_update_depth(hctx, &hctx->tags, nr,
                                                        false);
                } else {
                        ret = blk_mq_tag_update_depth(hctx, &hctx->sched_tags,
-- 
2.9.4

Reply via email to