On 09/22/2017 10:55 AM, Javier González wrote:
On 21 Sep 2017, at 13.27, Rakesh Pandit <rak...@tuxera.com> wrote:

The two pr_err messages are useless as they don't even differentiate
error code.

Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pandit <rak...@tuxera.com>
---
drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c | 12 ++----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c
index b92eabc..74ddb30 100644
--- a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c
+++ b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c
@@ -1734,16 +1734,8 @@ static void __pblk_down_page(struct pblk *pblk, struct 
ppa_addr *ppa_list,
#endif

        ret = down_timeout(&rlun->wr_sem, msecs_to_jiffies(30000));
-       if (ret) {
-               switch (ret) {
-               case -ETIME:
-                       pr_err("pblk: lun semaphore timed out\n");
-                       break;
-               case -EINTR:
-                       pr_err("pblk: lun semaphore timed out\n");
-                       break;
-               }
-       }
+       if (ret == -ETIME || ret == -EINTR)
+               pr_err("pblk: taking lun semaphore timed out: err %d\n", -ret);
}

void pblk_down_page(struct pblk *pblk, struct ppa_addr *ppa_list, int nr_ppas)
--
2.5.0

Looks good.


Reviewed-by: Javier González <jav...@cnexlabs.com>

Thanks, I picked it up.

Reply via email to