On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 02:29:06PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 17:15 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > No, if you only address issue on MD device, that is definitely not > > alternative of my patchset. > > A clarification: my patch series not only fixes suspend and resume for > md-on-SCSI > but also for all other scenario's in which resume locks up due to no tag being
I do care about if this patchset can fix non-MD cases, like btrfs/raid, or transport_spi, both are real reports. Could you make sure if your patchset can cover this non-MD devices? > available when the SCSI core tries to execute a power management command. Firstly your cover letter title is 'Make suspend and resume safe for md-on-SCSI', that makes me a bit nervous since it is for md-on-SCSI. Secondly if your changes on block/SCSI can work on both MD and non-MD, why is MD so special to be dealt with by the 1st MD patch? Can we remove it from this patchset? I am pretty sure that my patchset needn't any MD specific change. -- Ming
