On 2017/9/28 上午4:52, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 09/27/2017 10:48 PM, Michael Lyle wrote: >> Jens-- >> >> I think it's a race condition-- the individual closures remain valid. >> It's just that the list element has different meanings-- it's either a >> list actively being used to wake, or a linkage on one of several lists >> that is being used to await wake. If a closure goes back to wait very >> quickly after being woken, it can end up connecting its new wait-list >> with the being-woken list. > > Reading it a second time, looks like you are right. OK, then let's just > queue it up as-is, I'll add the Fixes line this time. > Hi Jens,
Copied, next time for similar situation, Fixes will be there. Thanks for doing this. -- Coly Li
