On 2017/10/8 下午1:25, Michael Lyle wrote: > The previous code artificially limited writeback rate to 1000000 > blocks/second (NSEC_PER_MSEC), which is a rate that can be met on fast > hardware. The rate limiting code works fine (though with decreased > precision) up to 3 orders of magnitude faster, so use NSEC_PER_SEC. > > Additionally, ensure that uint32_t is used as a type for rate throughout > the rate management so that type checking/clamp_t can work properly. > > bch_next_delay should be rewritten for increased precision and better > handling of high rates and long sleep periods, but this is adequate for > now. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Lyle <[email protected]> > Reported-by: Coly Li <[email protected]>
Added to for-test, I will update test result after the writeback performance test done (hopefully in 2 days). Thanks for fast fix. Coly Li [snip]
