On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:46:40AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 1/17/18 5:34 AM, Ming Lei wrote: > > We know this WARN_ON is harmless and the stack trace isn't useful too, > > so convert it to printk(), and avoid to confuse people. > > I disagree, it is useful to know the exact path it happened from, > in case it's a valid warning. It could be an inline run and
inline run is only possible in theory, since the window is too small. > we screwed up the logic, or it could be from a workqueue and > the reason would be entirely different. OK, if you don't agree, I will just add the comment on the races we found. -- Ming
