Hi Sagi,
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Sagi Grimberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
>
>> +struct ibtrs_clt_io_req {
>> + struct list_head list;
>> + struct ibtrs_iu *iu;
>> + struct scatterlist *sglist; /* list holding user data */
>> + unsigned int sg_cnt;
>> + unsigned int sg_size;
>> + unsigned int data_len;
>> + unsigned int usr_len;
>> + void *priv;
>> + bool in_use;
>> + struct ibtrs_clt_con *con;
>> + union {
>> + struct ib_pool_fmr **fmr_list;
>> + struct ibtrs_fr_desc **fr_list;
>> + };
>
>
> We are pretty much stuck with fmrs for legacy devices, it has
> no future support plans, please don't add new dependencies
> on it. Its already hard enough to get rid of it.
Got it, we have a plan to get rid of fmr. But as I remember our
internal tests: fr is slower. The question: why that can be
according to your experience? I will retest, but still that is
interesting to know.
>> + void *map_page;
>> + struct ibtrs_tag *tag;
>
>
> Can I ask why do you need another tag that is not the request
> tag?
Once I responded already, the summary is the following:
1. Indeed mq supports tags sharing, but only between hw queues, not
globally, so for us that means tags->nr_hw_queues = 1, which kills
performance.
2. We need tags sharing in the transport library, which should not
be tightly coupled with block device.
>> + u16 nmdesc;
>> + enum dma_data_direction dir;
>> + ibtrs_conf_fn *conf;
>> + unsigned long start_time;
>> +};
>> +
>
>
>> +static inline struct ibtrs_clt_con *to_clt_con(struct ibtrs_con *c)
>> +{
>> + if (unlikely(!c))
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + return container_of(c, struct ibtrs_clt_con, c);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline struct ibtrs_clt_sess *to_clt_sess(struct ibtrs_sess *s)
>> +{
>> + if (unlikely(!s))
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + return container_of(s, struct ibtrs_clt_sess, s);
>> +}
>
>
> Seems a bit awkward that container_of wrappers check pointer validity...
That can be fixed, frankly, I don't remember code paths where I
implicitly rely on that returned null: session or connection are
always expected as valid pointers.
>> +/**
>> + * list_next_or_null_rr - get next list element in round-robin fashion.
>> + * @pos: entry, starting cursor.
>> + * @head: head of the list to examine. This list must have at least
>> one
>> + * element, namely @pos.
>> + * @member: name of the list_head structure within typeof(*pos).
>> + *
>> + * Important to understand that @pos is a list entry, which can be
>> already
>> + * removed using list_del_rcu(), so if @head has become empty NULL will
>> be
>> + * returned. Otherwise next element is returned in round-robin fashion.
>> + */
>> +#define list_next_or_null_rcu_rr(pos, head, member) ({ \
>> + typeof(pos) ________next = NULL; \
>> + \
>> + if (!list_empty(head)) \
>> + ________next = (pos)->member.next != (head) ? \
>> + list_entry_rcu((pos)->member.next, \
>> + typeof(*pos), member) : \
>> + list_entry_rcu((pos)->member.next->next, \
>> + typeof(*pos), member); \
>> + ________next; \
>> +})
>
>
> Why is this local to your driver?
Yeah, of course I can try to extend list.h
>> +
>> +/* See ibtrs-log.h */
>> +#define TYPES_TO_SESSNAME(obj) \
>> + LIST(CASE(obj, struct ibtrs_clt_sess *, s.sessname), \
>> + CASE(obj, struct ibtrs_clt *, sessname))
>> +
>> +#define TAG_SIZE(clt) (sizeof(struct ibtrs_tag) + (clt)->pdu_sz)
>> +#define GET_TAG(clt, idx) ((clt)->tags + TAG_SIZE(clt) * idx)
>
>
> Still don't understand why this is even needed..
--
Roman
