On Sun, 2018-04-15 at 19:35 -0600, Tim Walker wrote: > I also believe the dual-actuator, or any significant HDD parallelism, > would map well onto an NVMe target, or NVMe-oF behind nvmet. Maybe a > lightweight virtual NVMe controller that would efficiently present the > HDD logs/mode pages/etc via the admin queue and the LUNs as fixed > namespaces...? > > Doug, I will flesh your three LUN idea out some more and send it up > the flagpole over here. Thanks for the input. > > I'd like to have a conversation at LSFMM and maybe pull together a > fairly well defined consensus recommendation. Is that possible? Can we > schedule it?
Hello Tim, I think that you have to submit a request to the LSF/MM program committee (lsf...@lists.linux-foundation.org) to add an item to the official agenda. In case this topic wouldn't be added to the official agenda we can still discuss this topic in a meeting room at the LSF/MM location. Bart.