On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 10:13:34AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> This is in preparation for having more write queues, in which
> case we would have needed to pass in more information than just
> a simple 'is_kswapd' boolean.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

Looks ok (having not run any kind of testing on this yet),
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>

--D

> ---
>  block/blk-wbt.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
>  block/blk-wbt.h |  4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-wbt.c b/block/blk-wbt.c
> index 3e34b41bcefc..25d202345965 100644
> --- a/block/blk-wbt.c
> +++ b/block/blk-wbt.c
> @@ -101,9 +101,13 @@ static bool wb_recent_wait(struct rq_wb *rwb)
>       return time_before(jiffies, wb->dirty_sleep + HZ);
>  }
>  
> -static inline struct rq_wait *get_rq_wait(struct rq_wb *rwb, bool is_kswapd)
> +static inline struct rq_wait *get_rq_wait(struct rq_wb *rwb,
> +                                       enum wbt_flags wb_acct)
>  {
> -     return &rwb->rq_wait[is_kswapd];
> +     if (wb_acct & WBT_KSWAPD)
> +             return &rwb->rq_wait[WBT_RWQ_KSWAPD];
> +
> +     return &rwb->rq_wait[WBT_RWQ_BG];
>  }
>  
>  static void rwb_wake_all(struct rq_wb *rwb)
> @@ -126,7 +130,7 @@ void __wbt_done(struct rq_wb *rwb, enum wbt_flags wb_acct)
>       if (!(wb_acct & WBT_TRACKED))
>               return;
>  
> -     rqw = get_rq_wait(rwb, wb_acct & WBT_KSWAPD);
> +     rqw = get_rq_wait(rwb, wb_acct);
>       inflight = atomic_dec_return(&rqw->inflight);
>  
>       /*
> @@ -529,11 +533,12 @@ static inline bool may_queue(struct rq_wb *rwb, struct 
> rq_wait *rqw,
>   * Block if we will exceed our limit, or if we are currently waiting for
>   * the timer to kick off queuing again.
>   */
> -static void __wbt_wait(struct rq_wb *rwb, unsigned long rw, spinlock_t *lock)
> +static void __wbt_wait(struct rq_wb *rwb, enum wbt_flags wb_acct,
> +                    unsigned long rw, spinlock_t *lock)
>       __releases(lock)
>       __acquires(lock)
>  {
> -     struct rq_wait *rqw = get_rq_wait(rwb, current_is_kswapd());
> +     struct rq_wait *rqw = get_rq_wait(rwb, wb_acct);
>       DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>  
>       if (may_queue(rwb, rqw, &wait, rw))
> @@ -584,7 +589,7 @@ static inline bool wbt_should_throttle(struct rq_wb *rwb, 
> struct bio *bio)
>   */
>  enum wbt_flags wbt_wait(struct rq_wb *rwb, struct bio *bio, spinlock_t *lock)
>  {
> -     unsigned int ret = 0;
> +     enum wbt_flags ret = 0;
>  
>       if (!rwb_enabled(rwb))
>               return 0;
> @@ -598,14 +603,14 @@ enum wbt_flags wbt_wait(struct rq_wb *rwb, struct bio 
> *bio, spinlock_t *lock)
>               return ret;
>       }
>  
> -     __wbt_wait(rwb, bio->bi_opf, lock);
> +     if (current_is_kswapd())
> +             ret |= WBT_KSWAPD;
> +
> +     __wbt_wait(rwb, ret, bio->bi_opf, lock);
>  
>       if (!blk_stat_is_active(rwb->cb))
>               rwb_arm_timer(rwb);
>  
> -     if (current_is_kswapd())
> -             ret |= WBT_KSWAPD;
> -
>       return ret | WBT_TRACKED;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/block/blk-wbt.h b/block/blk-wbt.h
> index a232c98fbf4d..8038b4a0d4ef 100644
> --- a/block/blk-wbt.h
> +++ b/block/blk-wbt.h
> @@ -19,7 +19,9 @@ enum wbt_flags {
>  };
>  
>  enum {
> -     WBT_NUM_RWQ             = 2,
> +     WBT_RWQ_BG              = 0,
> +     WBT_RWQ_KSWAPD,
> +     WBT_NUM_RWQ,
>  };
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to