On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:22:40AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 04:04:46PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 09:56 -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > > > Even some scsi drivers are susceptible to losing their requests with the > > > reverted behavior: take virtio-scsi for example, which returns RESET_TIMER > > > from it's timeout handler. With the behavior everyone seems to want, > > > a natural completion at or around the same time is lost forever because > > > it was blocked from completion with no way to recover. > > > > The patch I had posted handles a completion that occurs while a timeout is > > being handled properly. From > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg22196.html: > > Sounds like a win-win to me.
How do we get a fix into 4.18 at this part of the cycle? I think that is the most important prirority right now.
