On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:01:58PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> When bio_iov_iter_get_pages() is called from __blkdev_direct_IO_simple(),
> we already know that the content of the input iov_iter fits into a single
> bio, so we expect iov_iter_count(iter) to drop to 0. But in a single
> invocation,
> bio_iov_iter_get_pages() may add less bytes then we expect. For iov_iters with
> multiple segments (generated e.g. by writev()), it behaves like an iterator's
> next() function, taking only one step (segment) at a time. Furthermore, MM may
> fail or refuse to pin all requested pages. The latter may signify an error
> condition
> (in which case eventually an error code will be returned), the former does
> not.
>
> Call bio_iov_iter_get_pages() repeatedly to avoid short reads or writes.
> Otherwise, __generic_file_write_iter() falls back to buffered writes, which
> has been observed to cause data corruption in certain workloads.
>
> Fixes: 72ecad22d9f1 ("block: support a full bio worth of IO for simplified
> bdev direct-io")
> Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/block_dev.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
> index aba2541..561c34e 100644
> --- a/fs/block_dev.c
> +++ b/fs/block_dev.c
> @@ -222,6 +222,24 @@ __blkdev_direct_IO_simple(struct kiocb *iocb, struct
> iov_iter *iter,
> ret = bio_iov_iter_get_pages(&bio, iter);
> if (unlikely(ret))
> goto out;
> +
> + /*
> + * bio_iov_iter_get_pages() may add less bytes than we expect:
> + * - for multi-segment iov_iters, as it only adds one segment at a time
> + * - if MM refuses or fails to pin all requested pages. In this case,
> + * an error is returned eventually if no progress can be made.
> + */
> + while (iov_iter_count(iter) > 0 && bio.bi_vcnt < bio.bi_max_vecs) {
Please use the helper bio_full().
> + ret = bio_iov_iter_get_pages(&bio, iter);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + goto out;
> + }
When ret returns, pages pinned already need to be put.
Also I think the way suggested in the following link may be more generic:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=153199830130209&w=2
in which it is retried until no progress is made, and there should have
performance benefit for other users too, not only fix this partial dio
issue.
Thanks,
Ming
