Am 24.07.2018 um 06:03 schrieb Coly Li:
> Commit b1092c9af9ed ("bcache: allow quick writeback when backing idle")
> allows the writeback rate to be faster if there is no I/O request on a
> bcache device. It works well if there is only one bcache device attached
> to the cache set. If there are many bcache devices attached to a cache
> set, it may introduce performance regression because multiple faster
> writeback threads of the idle bcache devices will compete the btree level
> locks with the bcache device who have I/O requests coming.
> 
> This patch fixes the above issue by only permitting fast writebac when
> all bcache devices attached on the cache set are idle. And if one of the
> bcache devices has new I/O request coming, minimized all writeback
> throughput immediately and let PI controller __update_writeback_rate()
> to decide the upcoming writeback rate for each bcache device.
> 
> Also when all bcache devices are idle, limited wrieback rate to a small
> number is wast of thoughput, especially when backing devices are slower
> non-rotation devices (e.g. SATA SSD). This patch sets a max writeback
> rate for each backing device if the whole cache set is idle. A faster
> writeback rate in idle time means new I/Os may have more available space
> for dirty data, and people may observe a better write performance then.
> 
> Please note bcache may change its cache mode in run time, and this patch
> still works if the cache mode is switched from writeback mode and there
> is still dirty data on cache.
> 
> Fixes: Commit b1092c9af9ed ("bcache: allow quick writeback when backing idle")
> Cc: [email protected] #4.16+
> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Kai Krakow <[email protected]>
> Cc: Michael Lyle <[email protected]>
> Cc: Stefan Priebe <[email protected]>

Hi Coly,

i'm still experiencing the same bug as yesterday while rebooting every
two times i get a deadlock in cache_set_free.

Sadly it's so late ion the shutdown process that netconsole is already
unloaded or at least i get no messages from while it happens. The traces
look the same like yesterday.

Greets,
Stefan

> ---
> Channgelog:
> v2, Fix a deadlock reported by Stefan Priebe.
> v1, Initial version.
> 
>  drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h    |  11 ++--
>  drivers/md/bcache/request.c   |  51 ++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/md/bcache/super.c     |   1 +
>  drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c     |  14 +++--
>  drivers/md/bcache/util.c      |   2 +-
>  drivers/md/bcache/util.h      |   2 +-
>  drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  7 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> index d6bf294f3907..469ab1a955e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> @@ -328,13 +328,6 @@ struct cached_dev {
>        */
>       atomic_t                has_dirty;
>  
> -     /*
> -      * Set to zero by things that touch the backing volume-- except
> -      * writeback.  Incremented by writeback.  Used to determine when to
> -      * accelerate idle writeback.
> -      */
> -     atomic_t                backing_idle;
> -
>       struct bch_ratelimit    writeback_rate;
>       struct delayed_work     writeback_rate_update;
>  
> @@ -514,6 +507,8 @@ struct cache_set {
>       struct cache_accounting accounting;
>  
>       unsigned long           flags;
> +     atomic_t                idle_counter;
> +     atomic_t                at_max_writeback_rate;
>  
>       struct cache_sb         sb;
>  
> @@ -523,6 +518,8 @@ struct cache_set {
>  
>       struct bcache_device    **devices;
>       unsigned                devices_max_used;
> +     /* See set_at_max_writeback_rate() for how it is used */
> +     unsigned                previous_dirty_dc_nr;
>       struct list_head        cached_devs;
>       uint64_t                cached_dev_sectors;
>       struct closure          caching;
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> index ae67f5fa8047..1af3d96abfa5 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> @@ -1104,6 +1104,43 @@ static void detached_dev_do_request(struct 
> bcache_device *d, struct bio *bio)
>  
>  /* Cached devices - read & write stuff */
>  
> +static void quit_max_writeback_rate(struct cache_set *c,
> +                                 struct cached_dev *this_dc)
> +{
> +     int i;
> +     struct bcache_device *d;
> +     struct cached_dev *dc;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * If bch_register_lock is acquired by other attach/detach operations,
> +      * waiting here will increase I/O request latency for seconds or more.
> +      * To avoid such situation, only writeback rate of current cached device
> +      * is set to 1, and __update_write_back() will decide writeback rate
> +      * of other cached devices (remember c->idle_counter is 0 now).
> +      */
> +     if (mutex_trylock(&bch_register_lock)){
> +             for (i = 0; i < c->devices_max_used; i++) {
> +                     if (!c->devices[i])
> +                             continue;
> +
> +                     if (UUID_FLASH_ONLY(&c->uuids[i]))
> +                             continue;
> +
> +                     d = c->devices[i];
> +                     dc = container_of(d, struct cached_dev, disk);
> +                     /*
> +                      * set writeback rate to default minimum value,
> +                      * then let update_writeback_rate() to decide the
> +                      * upcoming rate.
> +                      */
> +                     atomic64_set(&dc->writeback_rate.rate, 1);
> +             }
> +
> +             mutex_unlock(&bch_register_lock);
> +     } else
> +             atomic64_set(&this_dc->writeback_rate.rate, 1);
> +}
> +
>  static blk_qc_t cached_dev_make_request(struct request_queue *q,
>                                       struct bio *bio)
>  {
> @@ -1119,7 +1156,19 @@ static blk_qc_t cached_dev_make_request(struct 
> request_queue *q,
>               return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
>       }
>  
> -     atomic_set(&dc->backing_idle, 0);
> +     if (d->c) {
> +             atomic_set(&d->c->idle_counter, 0);
> +             /*
> +              * If at_max_writeback_rate of cache set is true and new I/O
> +              * comes, quit max writeback rate of all cached devices
> +              * attached to this cache set, and set at_max_writeback_rate
> +              * to false.
> +              */
> +             if (unlikely(atomic_read(&d->c->at_max_writeback_rate) == 1)) {
> +                     atomic_set(&d->c->at_max_writeback_rate, 0);
> +                     quit_max_writeback_rate(d->c, dc);
> +             }
> +     }
>       generic_start_io_acct(q, rw, bio_sectors(bio), &d->disk->part0);
>  
>       bio_set_dev(bio, dc->bdev);
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> index fa4058e43202..fa532d9f9353 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> @@ -1687,6 +1687,7 @@ struct cache_set *bch_cache_set_alloc(struct cache_sb 
> *sb)
>       c->block_bits           = ilog2(sb->block_size);
>       c->nr_uuids             = bucket_bytes(c) / sizeof(struct uuid_entry);
>       c->devices_max_used     = 0;
> +     c->previous_dirty_dc_nr = 0;
>       c->btree_pages          = bucket_pages(c);
>       if (c->btree_pages > BTREE_MAX_PAGES)
>               c->btree_pages = max_t(int, c->btree_pages / 4,
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
> index 225b15aa0340..d719021bff81 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
> @@ -170,7 +170,8 @@ SHOW(__bch_cached_dev)
>       var_printf(writeback_running,   "%i");
>       var_print(writeback_delay);
>       var_print(writeback_percent);
> -     sysfs_hprint(writeback_rate,    dc->writeback_rate.rate << 9);
> +     sysfs_hprint(writeback_rate,
> +                  atomic64_read(&dc->writeback_rate.rate) << 9);
>       sysfs_hprint(io_errors,         atomic_read(&dc->io_errors));
>       sysfs_printf(io_error_limit,    "%i", dc->error_limit);
>       sysfs_printf(io_disable,        "%i", dc->io_disable);
> @@ -188,7 +189,8 @@ SHOW(__bch_cached_dev)
>               char change[20];
>               s64 next_io;
>  
> -             bch_hprint(rate,        dc->writeback_rate.rate << 9);
> +             bch_hprint(rate,
> +                        atomic64_read(&dc->writeback_rate.rate) << 9);
>               bch_hprint(dirty,       bcache_dev_sectors_dirty(&dc->disk) << 
> 9);
>               bch_hprint(target,      dc->writeback_rate_target << 9);
>               bch_hprint(proportional,dc->writeback_rate_proportional << 9);
> @@ -255,8 +257,12 @@ STORE(__cached_dev)
>  
>       sysfs_strtoul_clamp(writeback_percent, dc->writeback_percent, 0, 40);
>  
> -     sysfs_strtoul_clamp(writeback_rate,
> -                         dc->writeback_rate.rate, 1, INT_MAX);
> +     if (attr == &sysfs_writeback_rate) {
> +             int v;
> +
> +             sysfs_strtoul_clamp(writeback_rate, v, 1, INT_MAX);
> +             atomic64_set(&dc->writeback_rate.rate, v);
> +     }
>  
>       sysfs_strtoul_clamp(writeback_rate_update_seconds,
>                           dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds,
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/util.c b/drivers/md/bcache/util.c
> index fc479b026d6d..84f90c3d996d 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/util.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/util.c
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ uint64_t bch_next_delay(struct bch_ratelimit *d, uint64_t 
> done)
>  {
>       uint64_t now = local_clock();
>  
> -     d->next += div_u64(done * NSEC_PER_SEC, d->rate);
> +     d->next += div_u64(done * NSEC_PER_SEC, atomic64_read(&d->rate));
>  
>       /* Bound the time.  Don't let us fall further than 2 seconds behind
>        * (this prevents unnecessary backlog that would make it impossible
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/util.h b/drivers/md/bcache/util.h
> index cced87f8eb27..7e17f32ab563 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/util.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/util.h
> @@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ struct bch_ratelimit {
>        * Rate at which we want to do work, in units per second
>        * The units here correspond to the units passed to bch_next_delay()
>        */
> -     uint32_t                rate;
> +     atomic64_t              rate;
>  };
>  
>  static inline void bch_ratelimit_reset(struct bch_ratelimit *d)
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> index ad45ebe1a74b..11ffadc3cf8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,80 @@ static uint64_t __calc_target_rate(struct cached_dev *dc)
>       return (cache_dirty_target * bdev_share) >> WRITEBACK_SHARE_SHIFT;
>  }
>  
> +static bool set_at_max_writeback_rate(struct cache_set *c,
> +                                   struct cached_dev *dc)
> +{
> +     int i, dirty_dc_nr = 0;
> +     struct bcache_device *d;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * bch_register_lock is acquired in cached_dev_detach_finish() before
> +      * calling cancel_writeback_rate_update_dwork() to stop the delayed
> +      * kworker writeback_rate_update (where the context we are for now).
> +      * Therefore call mutex_lock() here may introduce deadlock when shut
> +      * down the bcache device.
> +      * c->previous_dirty_dc_nr is used to record previous calculated
> +      * dirty_dc_nr when mutex_trylock() last time succeeded. Then if
> +      * mutex_trylock() failed here, use c->previous_dirty_dc_nr as dirty
> +      * cached device number. Of cause it might be inaccurate, but a few more
> +      * or less loop before setting c->at_max_writeback_rate is much better
> +      * then a deadlock here.
> +      */
> +     if (mutex_trylock(&bch_register_lock)) {
> +             for (i = 0; i < c->devices_max_used; i++) {
> +                     if (!c->devices[i])
> +                             continue;
> +                     if (UUID_FLASH_ONLY(&c->uuids[i]))
> +                             continue;
> +                     d = c->devices[i];
> +                     dc = container_of(d, struct cached_dev, disk);
> +                     if (atomic_read(&dc->has_dirty))
> +                             dirty_dc_nr++;
> +             }
> +             c->previous_dirty_dc_nr = dirty_dc_nr;
> +
> +             mutex_unlock(&bch_register_lock);
> +     } else
> +             dirty_dc_nr = c->previous_dirty_dc_nr;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Idle_counter is increased everytime when update_writeback_rate()
> +      * is rescheduled in. If all backing devices attached to the same
> +      * cache set has same dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds value, it
> +      * is about 10 rounds of update_writeback_rate() is called on each
> +      * backing device, then the code will fall through at set 1 to
> +      * c->at_max_writeback_rate, and a max wrteback rate to each
> +      * dc->writeback_rate.rate. This is not very accurate but works well
> +      * to make sure the whole cache set has no new I/O coming before
> +      * writeback rate is set to a max number.
> +      */
> +     if (atomic_inc_return(&c->idle_counter) < dirty_dc_nr * 10)
> +             return false;
> +
> +     if (atomic_read(&c->at_max_writeback_rate) != 1)
> +             atomic_set(&c->at_max_writeback_rate, 1);
> +
> +
> +     atomic64_set(&dc->writeback_rate.rate, INT_MAX);
> +
> +     /* keep writeback_rate_target as existing value */
> +     dc->writeback_rate_proportional = 0;
> +     dc->writeback_rate_integral_scaled = 0;
> +     dc->writeback_rate_change = 0;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Check c->idle_counter and c->at_max_writeback_rate agagain in case
> +      * new I/O arrives during before set_at_max_writeback_rate() returns.
> +      * Then the writeback rate is set to 1, and its new value should be
> +      * decided via __update_writeback_rate().
> +      */
> +     if (atomic_read(&c->idle_counter) < dirty_dc_nr * 10 ||
> +         !atomic_read(&c->at_max_writeback_rate))
> +             return false;
> +
> +     return true;
> +}
> +
>  static void __update_writeback_rate(struct cached_dev *dc)
>  {
>       /*
> @@ -104,8 +178,9 @@ static void __update_writeback_rate(struct cached_dev *dc)
>  
>       dc->writeback_rate_proportional = proportional_scaled;
>       dc->writeback_rate_integral_scaled = integral_scaled;
> -     dc->writeback_rate_change = new_rate - dc->writeback_rate.rate;
> -     dc->writeback_rate.rate = new_rate;
> +     dc->writeback_rate_change = new_rate -
> +                     atomic64_read(&dc->writeback_rate.rate);
> +     atomic64_set(&dc->writeback_rate.rate, new_rate);
>       dc->writeback_rate_target = target;
>  }
>  
> @@ -138,9 +213,16 @@ static void update_writeback_rate(struct work_struct 
> *work)
>  
>       down_read(&dc->writeback_lock);
>  
> -     if (atomic_read(&dc->has_dirty) &&
> -         dc->writeback_percent)
> -             __update_writeback_rate(dc);
> +     if (atomic_read(&dc->has_dirty) && dc->writeback_percent) {
> +             /*
> +              * If the whole cache set is idle, set_at_max_writeback_rate()
> +              * will set writeback rate to a max number. Then it is
> +              * unncessary to update writeback rate for an idle cache set
> +              * in maximum writeback rate number(s).
> +              */
> +             if (!set_at_max_writeback_rate(c, dc))
> +                     __update_writeback_rate(dc);
> +     }
>  
>       up_read(&dc->writeback_lock);
>  
> @@ -422,27 +504,6 @@ static void read_dirty(struct cached_dev *dc)
>  
>               delay = writeback_delay(dc, size);
>  
> -             /* If the control system would wait for at least half a
> -              * second, and there's been no reqs hitting the backing disk
> -              * for awhile: use an alternate mode where we have at most
> -              * one contiguous set of writebacks in flight at a time.  If
> -              * someone wants to do IO it will be quick, as it will only
> -              * have to contend with one operation in flight, and we'll
> -              * be round-tripping data to the backing disk as quickly as
> -              * it can accept it.
> -              */
> -             if (delay >= HZ / 2) {
> -                     /* 3 means at least 1.5 seconds, up to 7.5 if we
> -                      * have slowed way down.
> -                      */
> -                     if (atomic_inc_return(&dc->backing_idle) >= 3) {
> -                             /* Wait for current I/Os to finish */
> -                             closure_sync(&cl);
> -                             /* And immediately launch a new set. */
> -                             delay = 0;
> -                     }
> -             }
> -
>               while (!kthread_should_stop() &&
>                      !test_bit(CACHE_SET_IO_DISABLE, &dc->disk.c->flags) &&
>                      delay) {
> @@ -715,7 +776,7 @@ void bch_cached_dev_writeback_init(struct cached_dev *dc)
>       dc->writeback_running           = true;
>       dc->writeback_percent           = 10;
>       dc->writeback_delay             = 30;
> -     dc->writeback_rate.rate         = 1024;
> +     atomic64_set(&dc->writeback_rate.rate, 1024);
>       dc->writeback_rate_minimum      = 8;
>  
>       dc->writeback_rate_update_seconds = WRITEBACK_RATE_UPDATE_SECS_DEFAULT;
> 

Reply via email to