On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 04:05:51PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 07:03:42AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > Before we go down this road, could we have a discussion about what > > hardware actually requires this? Storage has this weird assumption that > > I/Os must be at least 512 byte aligned in memory, and I don't know where > > this idea comes from. Network devices can do arbitrary byte alignment. > > Even USB controllers can do arbitrary byte alignment. Sure, performance > > is going to suck and there are definite risks on some architectures > > with doing IOs that are sub-cacheline aligned, but why is storage such a > > special snowflake that we assume that host controllers are only capable > > of doing 512-byte aligned DMAs? > > Actually most storage controllers requires 4-byte alignment, but there is > a significant subset that requires 512-byte alignment.
Can you name one that does require 512-byte alignment, preferably still in use? Or even >4-byte alignment. I just checked AHCI and that requires only 2-byte alignment. I have reason to believe that these are uncommon because of the feedback we got in the NVMe committee after releasing 1.0 which required 4-byte alignment from people whining that they just couldn't guarantee 4-byte alignment in their host devices and they absolutely needed to have no alignment requirements (!)
