Yes, please do.

Reviewed-by: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmb...@cnexlabs.com>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 10:08 AM Matias Bjørling <m...@lightnvm.io> wrote:
>
> On 10/26/2018 01:38 AM, Zhoujie Wu wrote:
> > The smeta area l2p mapping is empty, and actually the
> > recovery procedure only need to restore data sector's l2p
> > mapping. So ignore the smeta oob scan.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhoujie Wu <z...@marvell.com>
> > ---
> > v2: Modified based on suggestion from Hans. The smeta may not start from
> > paddr 0 if the first block is bad. Use pblk_line_smeta_start to calculate
> > the smeta start address.
> >
> >   drivers/lightnvm/pblk-recovery.c | 5 +++--
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-recovery.c 
> > b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-recovery.c
> > index 5740b75..0fbd30e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-recovery.c
> > +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-recovery.c
> > @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static int pblk_recov_scan_oob(struct pblk *pblk, 
> > struct pblk_line *line,
> >                              struct pblk_recov_alloc p)
> >   {
> >       struct nvm_tgt_dev *dev = pblk->dev;
> > +     struct pblk_line_meta *lm = &pblk->lm;
> >       struct nvm_geo *geo = &dev->geo;
> >       struct ppa_addr *ppa_list;
> >       struct pblk_sec_meta *meta_list;
> > @@ -342,12 +343,12 @@ static int pblk_recov_scan_oob(struct pblk *pblk, 
> > struct pblk_line *line,
> >       void *data;
> >       dma_addr_t dma_ppa_list, dma_meta_list;
> >       __le64 *lba_list;
> > -     u64 paddr = 0;
> > +     u64 paddr = pblk_line_smeta_start(pblk, line) + lm->smeta_sec;
> >       bool padded = false;
> >       int rq_ppas, rq_len;
> >       int i, j;
> >       int ret;
> > -     u64 left_ppas = pblk_sec_in_open_line(pblk, line);
> > +     u64 left_ppas = pblk_sec_in_open_line(pblk, line) - lm->smeta_sec;
> >
> >       if (pblk_line_wp_is_unbalanced(pblk, line))
> >               pblk_warn(pblk, "recovering unbalanced line (%d)\n", 
> > line->id);
> >
>
> Looks good to me. Hans, can I add your reviewed by?

Reply via email to