On 11/14/18 5:02 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Only the mq locking is left in the flush state machine.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
---
  block/blk-flush.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-flush.c b/block/blk-flush.c
index c53197dcdd70..fcd18b158fd6 100644
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static void blk_flush_queue_rq(struct request *rq, bool 
add_front)
   * completion and trigger the next step.
   *
   * CONTEXT:
- * spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock or fq->mq_flush_lock)
+ * spin_lock_irq(fq->mq_flush_lock)
   *
   * RETURNS:
   * %true if requests were added to the dispatch queue, %false otherwise.
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static void flush_end_io(struct request *flush_rq, 
blk_status_t error)
   * Please read the comment at the top of this file for more info.
   *
   * CONTEXT:
- * spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock or fq->mq_flush_lock)
+ * spin_lock_irq(fq->mq_flush_lock)
   *
   */
  static void blk_kick_flush(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_flush_queue 
*fq,

Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Teamlead Storage & Networking
[email protected]                                   +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Reply via email to