On 12/7/18 9:41 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-12-07 at 09:35 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
>> index 29bfe8017a2d..9e5bda8800f8 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
>> @@ -377,6 +377,16 @@ void blk_mq_sched_insert_request(struct request *rq, 
>> bool at_head,
>>  
>>      WARN_ON(e && (rq->tag != -1));
>>  
>> +    /*
>> +     * It's illegal to insert a request into the scheduler that has
>> +     * been through ->queue_rq(). Warn for that case, and use a bypass
>> +     * insert to be safe.
>> +     */
> 
> Shouldn't this refer to requests that have been prepared instead of requests
> that have been through ->queue_rq()? I think this function is called for
> requests that are requeued. Requeued requests have been through ->queue_rq()
> but are unprepared before being requeued.

If they are unprepared, RQF_DONTPREP should have been cleared. But needs
testing and verification, which is exactly why I didn't want to bundle with
the fix.

I'll test it later today.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Reply via email to