On 10/12/18 12:08 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
The unsigned 32 bits overflow check for the zone size value is already done within sd_zbc_check_zones() with the test:} else if (logical_to_sectors(sdkp->device, zone_blocks) > UINT_MAX) { so there is no need to check again for an out of range value in sd_zbc_read_zones(). Simplify the code and fix sd_zbc_check_zones() error return to -EFBIG instead of -ENODEV if the zone size is too large. Change the return type of sd_zbc_check_zones() to an int for the error code and return the zone size (zone_blocks) through a u32 pointer to avoid overflowing the signed 32 return value. Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> --- drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c | 19 ++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c b/drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c index ca73c46931c0..0678e1e108b0 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd_zbc.c @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static int sd_zbc_check_zoned_characteristics(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, * Returns the zone size in number of blocks upon success or an error code * upon failure. */ -static s64 sd_zbc_check_zones(struct scsi_disk *sdkp) +static int sd_zbc_check_zones(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, u32 *zblocks) { u64 zone_blocks = 0; sector_t max_lba, block = 0;
Actually I thought to just change the 's32' to 'int', and not adding another parameter; but anyway.
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]> Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking [email protected] +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
