On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 16:06 -0700, Evan Green wrote: > This series addresses some errors seen when using the loop > device directly backed by a block device. The first change plumbs > out the correct error message, and the second change prevents the > error from occurring in many cases.
Hi Evan, Can you provide some information about the use case? Why do you think that it would be useful to support backing a loop device by a block device? Why to use the loop driver instead of dm-linear for this use case? Thanks, Bart.
