On 12/6/18 12:25 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/5/18 12:43 AM, Jianchao Wang wrote:
>> We don't allow direct dispatch of anything but regular reads/writes
>> and insert all of non-read-write requests. However, this is not
>> correct for 'bypass_insert == true' case where inserting is ignored
>> and BLK_STS_RESOURCE is returned. The caller will fail forever.
>>
>> Fix it with inserting the non-read-write request to hctx dispatch
>> list to avoid to involve merge and io scheduler when bypass_insert
>> is true.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  block/blk-mq.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>> index 9005505..153af90 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>> @@ -1822,6 +1822,7 @@ static blk_status_t __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct 
>> blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>>  {
>>      struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
>>      bool run_queue = true;
>> +    bool force = false;
>>  
>>      /*
>>       * RCU or SRCU read lock is needed before checking quiesced flag.
>> @@ -1836,9 +1837,19 @@ static blk_status_t 
>> __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>>              goto insert;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    if (!blk_rq_can_direct_dispatch(rq) || (q->elevator && !bypass_insert))
>> +    if (q->elevator && !bypass_insert)
>>              goto insert;
>>  
>> +    if (!blk_rq_can_direct_dispatch(rq)) {
>> +            /*
>> +             * For 'bypass_insert == true' case, insert request into hctx
>> +             * dispatch list.
>> +             */
>> +            if (bypass_insert)
>> +                    force = true;
>> +            goto insert;
>> +    }
> 
> Just do force = bypass_insert, no need for the if.
> 

Yes, I will do it.

Thanks
Jianchao

Reply via email to