On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 09:56:29AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > After some arm twisting from Christoph, I finally caved and divorced the > aio-poll patches from aio/libaio itself. The io_uring interface itself > is useful and efficient, and after rebasing all the new goodies on top > of that, there was little reason to retail the aio connection. > > Hence io_uring was born. This is what I previously called scqring for > aio, but now as a standalone entity. Patch #5 adds the core of this > interface, but in short, it has two main data structures:
Please can we call it something that looks a little less like io_urine? aio_ring? io_ring? ring_io?
