On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 08:23 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Here's v11 of the io_uring project. Main fixes in this release is a
> rework of how we grab the ctx->uring_lock, never using trylock for it in
> a user visible way. Outside of that, fixes around locking for the polled
> list when we hit -EAGAIN conditions on IO submit. This fixes list
> corruption issues with polling that some users have reported.
> 
> As far as I'm concerned, this project is ready to get staged for 5.1.
> Please do review carefully so we can fix any minor nits that might still
> exist.
> 
> The liburing git repo has a full set of man pages for this, though they
> could probably still use a bit of polish. I'd also like to see a
> io_uring(7) man page to describe the overall design of the project,
> expect that in the not-so-distant future. You can clone that here:
> 
> git://git.kernel.dk/liburing
> 
> Patches are against 5.0-rc4, and can also be found in my io_uring branch
> here:
> 
> git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block io_uring
> 
> Changes since v10:
> - Rework uring_lock locking
> - Ensure that async contexts lock when fiddling with polled lists
> - Minor tweak to io_iopoll_check() continue looping condition
> - Fold __io_uring_enter() into io_uring_enter()

Hi Jens,

Which goal(s) do you want to realize with this new API? Is the goal perhaps
to reduce the overhead of submitting I/O and receiving I/O completions?
If so, where can I find a comparison of the performance of this API with
libaio and synchronous I/O?

Thanks,

Bart.

Reply via email to