On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 5:26 PM Al Viro <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm trying to put together some formal description of what's going on in
> there.
> Another question, BTW: updates of user->unix_inflight would seem to be movable
> into the callers of unix_{not,}inflight(). Any objections against lifting
> it into unix_{attach,detach}_fds()? We do, after all, have fp->count right
> there, so what's the point incrementing/decrementing the sucker one-by-one?
> _And_ we are checking it right there (in too_many_unix_fds() called from
> unix_attach_fds())...
I see no issues with that.
Also shouldn't the rlimit check be made against user->unix_inflight +
fp->count? Althought I'm not quite following if fp->user can end up
different from current_user() and what should happen in that case...
Thanks,
Miklos
