On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 09:04:54AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 03:36:26PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 01:55:05PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 09:50:26AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > Add one test to cover changes on block passthrough IO interface,
> > > > such as blk_rq_map_user(), blk_rq_map_user_iov(), blk_rq_unmap_user()
> > > > and blk_rq_map_kern().
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > >  tests/block/029     | 111 
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  tests/block/029.out |   4 ++
> > > >  2 files changed, 115 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100755 tests/block/029
> > > >  create mode 100644 tests/block/029.out
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/tests/block/029 b/tests/block/029
> > > > new file mode 100755
> > > > index 000000000000..c7c674464285
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tests/block/029
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
> > > > +#!/bin/bash
> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > > > +# Copyright (c) 2019 Ming Lei <[email protected]>
> > > > +#
> > > > +# Test userspace IO on NVMe loop device
> > > 
> > > This is still missing a reference to the patch it's testing.
> > > 
> > > > +. tests/nvme/rc
> > > 
> > > Shouldn't this be in the nvme group?
> > > 
> > > > +DESCRIPTION="test userspace IO via nvme-cli read/write interface"
> > > > +QUICK=1
> > > > +
> > > > +requires() {
> > > > +       _have_program nvme && _have_modules loop nvme-loop nvmet && \
> > > > +               _have_configfs
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +__test_user_io()
> > > > +{
> > > > +       local disk="$1"
> > > > +       local start=$2
> > > > +       local cnt=$3
> > > > +
> > > > +       local bs=$(blockdev --getss $disk)
> > > 
> > > This still has a ton of missing quoting and shellcheck errors.
> > > 
> > > I fixed all of this and pushed to
> > > https://github.com/osandov/blktests/tree/user-io. Let me know if this
> > > looks fine and I'll push it to master.
> 
> Yeah, it is fine for me.
> 

Thanks, applied.

Reply via email to