On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 08:23:30AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Instead of needing a special macro to iterate over all pages in
> a bvec just do a second passs over the whole bio.  This also matches
> what we do on the release side.  The release side helper is moved
> up to where we need the get helper to clearly express the symmetry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> ---
>  block/bio.c          | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  include/linux/bvec.h |  5 -----
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> index c2a389b1509a..d3490aeb1a7e 100644
> --- a/block/bio.c
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -861,6 +861,26 @@ int bio_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_add_page);
>  
> +static void bio_get_pages(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> +     struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
> +     struct bio_vec *bvec;
> +     int i;
> +
> +     bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, i, iter_all)
> +             get_page(bvec->bv_page);
> +}
> +
> +static void bio_release_pages(struct bio *bio)
> +{
> +     struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
> +     struct bio_vec *bvec;
> +     int i;
> +
> +     bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, i, iter_all)
> +             put_page(bvec->bv_page);
> +}
> +
>  static int __bio_iov_bvec_add_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
>  {
>       const struct bio_vec *bv = iter->bvec;
> @@ -875,15 +895,6 @@ static int __bio_iov_bvec_add_pages(struct bio *bio, 
> struct iov_iter *iter)
>                               bv->bv_offset + iter->iov_offset);
>       if (unlikely(size != len))
>               return -EINVAL;
> -
> -     if (!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_NO_PAGE_REF)) {
> -             struct page *page;
> -             int i;
> -
> -             mp_bvec_for_each_page(page, bv, i)
> -                     get_page(page);
> -     }
> -
>       iov_iter_advance(iter, size);
>       return 0;
>  }
> @@ -963,13 +974,6 @@ int bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct 
> iov_iter *iter)
>       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bio->bi_vcnt))
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
> -     /*
> -      * If this is a BVEC iter, then the pages are kernel pages. Don't
> -      * release them on IO completion, if the caller asked us to.
> -      */
> -     if (is_bvec && iov_iter_bvec_no_ref(iter))
> -             bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_NO_PAGE_REF);
> -
>       do {
>               if (is_bvec)
>                       ret = __bio_iov_bvec_add_pages(bio, iter);
> @@ -977,6 +981,11 @@ int bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct 
> iov_iter *iter)
>                       ret = __bio_iov_iter_get_pages(bio, iter);
>       } while (!ret && iov_iter_count(iter) && !bio_full(bio));
>  
> +     if (iov_iter_bvec_no_ref(iter))
> +             bio_set_flag(bio, BIO_NO_PAGE_REF);
> +     else
> +             bio_get_pages(bio);
> +
>       return bio->bi_vcnt ? 0 : ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1670,16 +1679,6 @@ void bio_set_pages_dirty(struct bio *bio)
>       }
>  }
>  
> -static void bio_release_pages(struct bio *bio)
> -{
> -     struct bio_vec *bvec;
> -     int i;
> -     struct bvec_iter_all iter_all;
> -
> -     bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, i, iter_all)
> -             put_page(bvec->bv_page);
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * bio_check_pages_dirty() will check that all the BIO's pages are still 
> dirty.
>   * If they are, then fine.  If, however, some pages are clean then they must
> diff --git a/include/linux/bvec.h b/include/linux/bvec.h
> index f6275c4da13a..307bbda62b7b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bvec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bvec.h
> @@ -189,9 +189,4 @@ static inline void mp_bvec_last_segment(const struct 
> bio_vec *bvec,
>       }
>  }
>  
> -#define mp_bvec_for_each_page(pg, bv, i)                             \
> -     for (i = (bv)->bv_offset / PAGE_SIZE;                           \
> -             (i <= (((bv)->bv_offset + (bv)->bv_len - 1) / PAGE_SIZE)) && \
> -             (pg = bvec_nth_page((bv)->bv_page, i)); i += 1)
> -
>  #endif /* __LINUX_BVEC_ITER_H */
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]>

-- 
Ming

Reply via email to