Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <[email protected]>
On 5/30/19 5:01 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Add documentation for the @rqw argument and change " - " into ": ".
>
> Fixes: 84f603246db9 ("block: add rq_qos_wait to rq_qos") # v5.0-rc1~52^2~140.
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
> ---
> block/blk-rq-qos.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-rq-qos.c b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
> index 3f55b56f24bc..659ccb8b693f 100644
> --- a/block/blk-rq-qos.c
> +++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
> @@ -209,9 +209,10 @@ static int rq_qos_wake_function(struct wait_queue_entry
> *curr,
>
> /**
> * rq_qos_wait - throttle on a rqw if we need to
> - * @private_data - caller provided specific data
> - * @acquire_inflight_cb - inc the rqw->inflight counter if we can
> - * @cleanup_cb - the callback to cleanup in case we race with a waker
> + * @rqw: rqw to throttle on
> + * @private_data: caller provided specific data
> + * @acquire_inflight_cb: inc the rqw->inflight counter if we can
> + * @cleanup_cb: the callback to cleanup in case we race with a waker
> *
> * This provides a uniform place for the rq_qos users to do their
> throttling.
> * Since you can end up with a lot of things sleeping at once, this manages
> the
>
