ping > Il giorno 30 mag 2019, alle ore 17:02, Paolo Valente > <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > Hi Jens, > have you had time to look into this? > > Thanks, > Paolo > >> Il giorno 21 mag 2019, alle ore 10:01, Paolo Valente >> <[email protected]> ha scritto: >> >> Many userspace tools and services use the proportional-share policy of >> the blkio/io cgroups controller. The CFQ I/O scheduler implemented >> this policy for the legacy block layer. To modify the weight of a >> group in case CFQ was in charge, the 'weight' parameter of the group >> must be modified. On the other hand, the BFQ I/O scheduler implements >> the same policy in blk-mq, but, with BFQ, the parameter to modify has >> a different name: bfq.weight (forced choice until legacy block was >> present, because two different policies cannot share a common parameter >> in cgroups). >> >> Due to CFQ legacy, most if not all userspace configurations still use >> the parameter 'weight', and for the moment do not seem likely to be >> changed. But, when CFQ went away with legacy block, such a parameter >> ceased to exist. >> >> So, a simple workaround has been proposed by Johannes [1] to make all >> configurations work: add a symlink, named weight, to bfq.weight. This >> pair of patches adds: >> 1) the possibility to create a symlink to a cgroup file; >> 2) the above 'weight' symlink. >> >> Thanks, >> Paolo >> >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/8/555 >> >> Angelo Ruocco (2): >> cgroup: let a symlink too be created with a cftype file >> block, bfq: add weight symlink to the bfq.weight cgroup parameter >> >> block/bfq-cgroup.c | 6 ++++-- >> include/linux/cgroup-defs.h | 3 +++ >> kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.20.1 >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
