On 7/2/19 5:50 PM, Minwoo Im wrote:
>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>> index 5143a8e19b63..9855c5d5027d 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>> @@ -1127,17 +1127,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(direct_make_request);
>> */
>> blk_qc_t submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
>> {
>> + unsigned int count = bio_sectors(bio);
> Chaitanya,
>
> Could it have a single empty line right after this just like you have
> for the if-statement below for the block_dump. It's just a nitpick.
Yeah, again can be done at the time of applying patch, if Jens is okay
with that.
Otherwise I can send V2.
>
>> /*
>> * If it's a regular read/write or a barrier with data attached,
>> * go through the normal accounting stuff before submission.
>> */
>> if (bio_has_data(bio)) {
>> - unsigned int count;
>>
>> if (unlikely(bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME))
>> count = queue_logical_block_size(bio->bi_disk->queue)
>> >> 9;
>> - else
>> - count = bio_sectors(bio);
>>
>> if (op_is_write(bio_op(bio))) {
>> count_vm_events(PGPGOUT, count);
>> @@ -1145,15 +1143,16 @@ blk_qc_t submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
>> task_io_account_read(bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
>> count_vm_events(PGPGIN, count);
>> }
>> + }
>>
>> - if (unlikely(block_dump)) {
>> - char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
>> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s(%d): %s block %Lu on %s (%u
>> sectors)\n",
>> - current->comm, task_pid_nr(current),
>> - blk_op_str(bio_op(bio)),
>> - (unsigned long long)bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
>> - bio_devname(bio, b), count);
>> - }
>> + if (unlikely(block_dump)) {
>> + char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
>> +
>> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s(%d): %s block %Lu on %s (%u sectors)\n",
>> + current->comm, task_pid_nr(current),
>> + blk_op_str(bio_op(bio)),
>> + (unsigned long long)bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
>> + bio_devname(bio, b), count);
> It would be great if non-data command is traced, I think.
>
> Reviewed-by: Minwoo Im <[email protected]>
>