> 在 2019年7月8日，12:13，Jens Axboe <[email protected]> 写道：
>
> On 7/7/19 8:07 PM, Jackie Liu wrote:
>> INFO: task syz-executor.5:8634 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
>> Not tainted 5.2.0-rc5+ #3
>> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>> syz-executor.5 D25632 8634 8224 0x00004004
>> Call Trace:
>> context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:2818 [inline]
>> __schedule+0x658/0x9e0 kernel/sched/core.c:3445
>> schedule+0x131/0x1d0 kernel/sched/core.c:3509
>> schedule_timeout+0x9a/0x2b0 kernel/time/timer.c:1783
>> do_wait_for_common+0x35e/0x5a0 kernel/sched/completion.c:83
>> __wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:104 [inline]
>> wait_for_common kernel/sched/completion.c:115 [inline]
>> wait_for_completion+0x47/0x60 kernel/sched/completion.c:136
>> kthread_stop+0xb4/0x150 kernel/kthread.c:559
>> io_sq_thread_stop fs/io_uring.c:2252 [inline]
>> io_finish_async fs/io_uring.c:2259 [inline]
>> io_ring_ctx_free fs/io_uring.c:2770 [inline]
>> io_ring_ctx_wait_and_kill+0x268/0x880 fs/io_uring.c:2834
>> io_uring_release+0x5d/0x70 fs/io_uring.c:2842
>> __fput+0x2e4/0x740 fs/file_table.c:280
>> ____fput+0x15/0x20 fs/file_table.c:313
>> task_work_run+0x17e/0x1b0 kernel/task_work.c:113
>> tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:185 [inline]
>> exit_to_usermode_loop arch/x86/entry/common.c:168 [inline]
>> prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x402/0x4f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:199
>> syscall_return_slowpath+0x110/0x440 arch/x86/entry/common.c:279
>> do_syscall_64+0x126/0x140 arch/x86/entry/common.c:304
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>> RIP: 0033:0x412fb1
>> Code: 80 3b 7c 0f 84 c7 02 00 00 c7 85 d0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 8b 05 cf
>> a6 24 00 49 8b 14 24 41 b9 cb 2a 44 00 48 89 ee 48 89 df <48> 85 c0 4c 0f
>> 45 c8 45 31 c0 31 c9 e8 0e 5b 00 00 85 c0 41 89 c7
>> RSP: 002b:00007ffe7ee6a180 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003
>> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 0000000000412fb1
>> RDX: 0000001b2d920000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003
>> RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 00000000f3a3e1f8 R09: 00000000f3a3e1fc
>> R10: 00007ffe7ee6a260 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 000000000075c9a0
>> R13: 000000000075c9a0 R14: 0000000000024c00 R15: 000000000075bf2c
>>
>> =============================================
>>
>> There is an wrong logic, when kthread_park running
>> in front of io_sq_thread.
>>
>> CPU#0 CPU#1
>>
>> io_sq_thread_stop: int kthread(void *_create):
>>
>> kthread_park()
>> __kthread_parkme(self); <<< Wrong
>> kthread_stop()
>> << wait for self->exited
>> << clear_bit KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK
>>
>> ret = threadfn(data);
>> |
>> |- io_sq_thread
>> |- kthread_should_park() << false
>> |- schedule() <<< nobody wake up
>>
>> stuck CPU#0 stuck CPU#1
>>
>> So, use a new variable sqo_thread_started to ensure that io_sq_thread
>> run first, then io_sq_thread_stop.
>>
>> Reported-by: [email protected]
>> Signed-off-by: Jackie Liu <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> fs/io_uring.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>> index 4ef62a4..b7d92fa 100644
>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>> @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@
>> #define IORING_MAX_ENTRIES 4096
>> #define IORING_MAX_FIXED_FILES 1024
>>
>> +#define SQO_THREAD_STARTED 1
>
> Should be 0, first bit.
>
>> @@ -2243,6 +2249,8 @@ static int io_sqe_files_unregister(struct io_ring_ctx
>> *ctx)
>> static void io_sq_thread_stop(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>> {
>> if (ctx->sqo_thread) {
>> + while (unlikely(!test_bit(SQO_THREAD_STARTED, &ctx->sqo_flags)))
>> + schedule();
>
> This doesn't really look safe - who wakes you up if the thread wasn't
> started to begin with, but got started right after? This needs to use
> some variant of a completion struct, for example, or some other way of
> waiting for the thread to have started.
Hi, Jens.
Yes, you are right, I will use a completion struct for new version, base
on 'drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_netdev.c',
It's wl->txq_thread_started.
Thanks.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
>
