On 7/9/19 8:29 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 06:02:19PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> Simultaneously writing to a sequential zone of a zoned block device
>> from multiple contexts requires mutual exclusion for BIO issuing to
>> ensure that writes happen sequentially. However, even for a well
>> behaved user correctly implementing such synchronization, BIO plugging
>> may interfere and result in BIOs from the different contextx to be
>> reordered if plugging is done outside of the mutual exclusion section,
>> e.g. the plug was started by a function higher in the call chain than
>> the function issuing BIOs.
>>
>>        Context A                           Context B
>>
>>     | blk_start_plug()
>>     | ...
>>     | seq_write_zone()
>>       | mutex_lock(zone)
>>       | submit_bio(bio-0)
>>       | submit_bio(bio-1)
>>       | mutex_unlock(zone)
>>       | return
>>     | ------------------------------> | seq_write_zone()
>>                                     | mutex_lock(zone)
>>                                     | submit_bio(bio-2)
>>                                     | mutex_unlock(zone)
>>     | <------------------------------ |
>>     | blk_finish_plug()
>>
>> In the above example, despite the mutex synchronization resulting in the
>> correct BIO issuing order 0, 1, 2, context A BIOs 0 and 1 end up being
>> issued after BIO 2 when the plug is released with blk_finish_plug().
> 
> I am wondering how you guarantee that context B is always run after
> context A.
> 
>>
>> To fix this problem, introduce the internal helper function
>> blk_mq_plug() to access the current context plug, return the current
>> plug only if the target device is not a zoned block device or if the
>> BIO to be plugged not a write operation. Otherwise, ignore the plug and
>> return NULL, resulting is all writes to zoned block device to never be
>> plugged.
> 
> Another candidate approach is to run the following code before
> releasing 'zone' lock:
> 
>       if (current->plug)
>               blk_finish_plug(context->plug)
> 
> Then we can fix zone specific issue in zone code only, and avoid generic
> blk-core change for zone issue.

I prefer that to the existing solution as well.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Reply via email to