Alan Stern <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Unfortunately, I don't know how to fix it and don't have much time to > > > investigate it right now - and it's something that can be added back > > > later. > > > > The cause of your problem is quite simple: > > > > static int usbdev_notify(struct notifier_block *self, > > unsigned long action, void *dev) > > { > > switch (action) { > > case USB_DEVICE_ADD: > > + post_usb_device_notification(dev, NOTIFY_USB_DEVICE_ADD, 0); > > break; > > case USB_DEVICE_REMOVE: > > + post_usb_device_notification(dev, NOTIFY_USB_DEVICE_REMOVE, 0); > > + usbdev_remove(dev); > > + break; > > + case USB_BUS_ADD: > > + post_usb_bus_notification(dev, NOTIFY_USB_BUS_ADD, 0); > > + break; > > + case USB_BUS_REMOVE: > > + post_usb_bus_notification(dev, NOTIFY_USB_BUS_REMOVE, 0); > > usbdev_remove(dev); > > break; > > } > > > > The original code had usbdev_remove(dev) under the USB_DEVICE_REMOVE > > case. The patch mistakenly moves it, putting it under the > ------------------------------^^^^^ > > Sorry, I should have said "duplicates" it.
Ah, thanks. I'd already removed the USB bus notifications, so I'll leave them out for now. David
